O’Rourke v. Jason Inc., 978 F. Supp. 41 (D. Mass. 1997)
Kevin O’Rourke was an employee with the Springfield Resource Recovery Plant in Agawam, Massachusetts. O’Rourke maintained and monitored the plant’s boilers. On July 14, 1991, O’Rourke investigated a malfunction in one of the boilers. In an attempt to cool down the system for further investigation, O’Rourke unscrewed the nuts that secured the doors. However, when he began to unscrew the nuts on one door, he noticed water leaking. As he turned away, pressure withing the hopper door forced the door to swing open. O’Rourke suffered first and second degree burns on his back and legs from contact with the scalding water.
O’Rourke filed a product liability lawsuit against the designer and manufacturer of the boiler’s hopper doors. He indicated the injury occurred on July 16th, 1991. Throughout the pretrial motions and discovery, the documents assumed the accident occurred on July 16th. In a motion filed by the plaintiff on February 14th, 1997, for the first time the motion papers referred to the injury occurring on July 14, 1991. On that same day, the parties had agreed to a settlement. The plaintiff’s attorney requested a hearing before the judge to approve the settlement.
On the morning of the settlement hearing, the defendant’s counsel was advised that the injury occurred on July 14th, not July 16th. The defendants refused to sign the settlement because the lawsuit appeared to have been filed one day after the statute of limitations ran out. The plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the settlement, and the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the case.
The court ruled that the important point is that a statute of limitations starts to run when an event has occurred which was reasonably likely to put a plaintiff on notice that someone may have caused his injury. It was O’Rourke’s counsel’s mistaken belief that the injury occurred on July 16, 1991, causing him to ensure that the complaint was filed by that date. Unfortunately, the date of filing, July 15, 1994, was one day late, making the settlement unenforceable.
The law firm of Walker Morgan is located at 135 E Main St., Lexington, SC 29072. All lawyers at Walker Morgan are licensed to practice law in the State of South Carolina. Should you wish to retain our firm for legal representation regarding a potential case in any other jurisdiction we are required to associate local counsel in that foreign jurisdiction and seek permission from a court of the foreign jurisdiction to temporarily engage in the practice of law therein for purposes of pursuing your potential claim only.
By offering the following information the lawyers at Walker Morgan are not offering legal advice or legal guidance. The lawyers at Walker Morgan are not licensed to practice law in Massachusetts. Should you have a question/concern specific to Massachusetts law, please contact an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Massachusetts.