Walker Morgan LLC

Market Failures

Inside the Insurance Industry – Market Failures

A key issue that causes issues in insurance markets is the informational asymmetry between the party seeking insurance coverage and the insurance company providing the coverage. The party seeking coverage has more accurate information about their own levels or risk than the insurance company. This disparity of informational power can lead to several market distortions, most notably adverse selection and moral hazard.

Adverse Selection

Under traditional market assumptions, an individual’s demand for insurance is related to that individual’s level of risk. Higher risk individuals are more likely to purchase insurance and are more willing to purchase insurance at a higher cost. Conversely, low risk individuals are willing to pay less for coverage because their probable exposure is lower. In a situation of informational asymmetry, where the individual levels of risk are known to the consumer but not to the insurer, insurers are unable to price differentiate between high risk and low risk consumers.

Because of this, insurers are forced to price insurance at the average level of risk. This leads to low risk individuals self-selecting out of the market which in turn increases the average level of risk. Insurance companies understand this opt-out behavior and increase their premium rates which in turn causes the new set of low risk consumer to opt out. This cycle could repeat infinitely until the insurance market simply ceases to function. Alternatively, if insurers know individual risk factors but are prevented from using this information to price discriminate (for example, if insurers are prohibited from using information such as race, gender, age, or pre-existing conditions) it could lead to the same outcome.

Consider smoking as an example. Non-smokers, on average, live longer and have less medical problems than smokers. In either health or life insurance policies, if the insurance premium does not take into account the smoking status of the insured then smokers are more likely to purchase the policy—because they have a higher risk and therefore higher likelihood of using the insurance—and non-smokers are less likely to purchase the policy. This in turn creates a higher risk for the policy as a whole. The insurance company must increase rates, or it runs the risk of not having sufficient premiums to cover the claims made by policy holders. Increased rates push more non-smokers out of the market and the cycle continues.

Rectifying Adverse Selection

There are two predominate methods for insurers to counteract the issue of adverse selection. First, they can attempt to combat the informational asymmetry problem. This is done by requiring up front information from individuals seeking to buy a policy. Common examples include health questionnaires formerly used by health insurance companies and credit scores used by vehicle insurance companies. This gives the insurer more information which they can use to price discriminate according to individual risk.

But this method has potential drawbacks. In some cases, price discrimination is viewed unfavorably. Recent changes in the health care market brought about by the Affordable Care Act show demonstrate a societal distaste for charging more or refusing coverage of pre-existing conditions. Another drawback is that sometimes the information gained through this process isn’t accurate or complete. Those seeking insurance have an incentive to protect their informational advantage. This can lead to incomplete or inaccurate reports of information requested. When available, insurers combat this problem by including clauses that permit them to deny claims if the information is not provided accurately in good faith.

A second method of counteracting adverse selection is to modify the process through which insurance is offered or selected. For example, instead of offering health insurance on an individual basis it can be offered to a group of people based on characteristics other than health conditions. Health insurance offered through the workplace is an example of this type of behavior. While this process still allows for some selective behavior, it greatly reduces the individual incentive to opt-out of coverage. The individual shared responsibility provision—also referred to as the individual mandate—is based off of this approach to combatting adverse selection.

Moral Hazard

Moral hazard is a concept used to explain the fact that individuals are willing to take greater risks when they are covered by insurance than they would without insurance. Put another way, insurance encourages more risky behavior. In this context, the informational asymmetry is in the conduct of the insured after they are already insured. Because insurance covers some or all of the financial costs of a negative consequence, individuals may not take the full cost of their action into consideration before acting.

A second component of the moral hazard problem is over consumption of coverage. Because insured do not bear the cost (or at least the full cost), they may desire more benefits afforded by coverage than they otherwise would. The health care market again serves as a good illustration. Insured individuals consume more care, especially more preventative care, than non-insured. This makes logical sense because insured receive the full benefit of the care without accounting for the full cost.

Rectifying Moral Hazard

Moral hazard is difficult to combat. The costs of monitoring insured —both fiscal and political—are prohibitively high. Instead, insurers attempt to stem moral hazard by requiring deductibles and/or copays. Deductibles require that the insured pay a certain amount before the insurance kicks in. This allows the individual to be protected from high cost accidents while still holding them accountable for minor accidents which are the most likely consequence of moral hazard.

Copays require that the insured pay a portion of the costs of services. This is an attempt to induce the individual to engage in a cost-benefit analysis before seeking the service. While it may not make the insured take into account the full costs of their action, even a small copay can at least encourage the insured to think about the necessity of the service.

Sources

Healthcare.gov

Hindawi

Internal Revenue Service

FREE CONSULTATION

Our Attorneys

injury lawyer kirk morgan

Kirk Morgan

Attorney

injury lawyer billy walker

Billy Walker

Attorney

injury lawyer will walker

Will Walker

Attorney

injury lawyer chuck slaughter

Chuck Slaughter

Attorney

Types of Burns

Hot Fire Icon

Degrees of Burns

First , second , and third degree burns

Learn More
Medical Attention Icon

Burn Injuries

There are many types of burn injuries

Learn More
Heat Icon

Scald Burn Injury

Caused when very hot liquids come into contact with skin

Learn More
Electricty Plug In Icon

Electrical Burns

Electricity can burn the skin and is capable of causing internal damage

Learn More
Chemical Burn Injury Icon

Chemical Burns

Caused when a strong acid or base comes into direct contact with skin

Learn More
Car Icon

Car/Boating Accidents

Thermal burns can occur if the car catches fire or explodes

Learn More
Small Fires Icon

Gas Explosions

Caused when a gas leak combines with an ignition source

Learn More
Business Icon

Worker’s Compensation

If you've been burned on the job, you may need legal guidance

Learn More
Battery Icon

E-Cigarette Burns

Can be caused by defective batteries or overheated vapor

Learn More

WE HAVE THE EXPERIENCE

National Trial Lawyers Badge
American Leaders Forum Badge
American Bar Badge
American Judicature Society Badge
South Carolina Association for Justice Badge
Super Lawyers Logo
NBTA Badge
Lawyers.com Badge
Civil Justice Foundation Badge
Melvin Belli Badge
SCAJ Association Badge
SC Capital Club Badge